Like the title says. I know that it gives an average of the total cores but since there is pretty much no documentation, I was woundering if there might be some secret syntax that will do the do. Yes, I know that RainMeter will do this but ; 1.) I would like to keep it in the (BB) family and 2.) going through the hassel of making a completely custom RainMeter skin is not something I would look forward to be doing.
Any way to get per core CPU readings in bbInterface iTunes?
#1
Posted 24 January 2015 - 04:21 PM
#2
Posted 24 January 2015 - 05:27 PM
I am afraid I am a little lost here. All you gotta do is ctrl+ right click on an element (frame or button) and then go Control Options/Caption/System Monitor/CPU Usage.
Or did you mean something else?
#3
Posted 25 January 2015 - 03:28 AM
OK, a bit more in depth... I've had a bbI system monitor for quite some time now and it was great when I was on a Pentium 4 that only has a single core CPU (see the attached pic). But I have (since late Dec.) assembled a new computer with an Intel I5 chip that has 4 CPU cores and 16 gig of RAM (this will be 32 gig within a month or two). Two of the bbI system meters have now become unnessissary: swap file is always at 0%, page file is always at 5%. And RAM has never gone over around 25% or so (so far) even when I have a fairly heavy project loaded in my DAW. The RAM usage should get cut in half once I fill the other two memory slots and there is not a real good reason to monitor it other than if a proggy has a memory leak. I need to redo my meters and there are 4 slots to fill and 4 CPU cores... Since bbInterface iTunes was coded after multicore CPU's came along, I was just wondering if that support was added. But only a developer would know for sure since, as I said before, there is not a lot of documentation... I can just use two larger meters (RAM & CPU) but I figure there is no harm in asking in the off chance that there is a way to do the 4 cores.
Attached Files
- Paz likes this
#4
Posted 25 January 2015 - 07:32 AM
I have an i7 with the same issues. No multicore support, I am afraid... And no need for more RAM if you don't have a 64-bit environment...
#5
Posted 25 January 2015 - 08:50 AM
should not be that hard to add
- pitkon and Paz like this
#6
Posted 25 January 2015 - 10:06 AM
should not be that hard to add
Looking forward to your magic, moj...
- Paz likes this
#7
Posted 25 January 2015 - 02:01 PM
In Conky Linux, it can be done like this :
${color yellow}Core 0: ${hr 2}$colorFreq: ${freq 1}MHz${cpubar cpu1 10,70}${cpugraph cpu1 000000 ffffff}${color red}Core 1: ${hr 2}$colorFreq: ${freq 2}MHz${cpubar cpu2 10,70}${cpugraph cpu2 000000 ffffff}${color yellow}Core 2: ${hr 2}$colorFreq: ${freq 3}MHz${cpubar cpu3 10,70}${cpugraph cpu3 000000 ffffff}${color red}Core 3: ${hr 2}$colorFreq: ${freq 4}MHz${cpubar cpu4 10,70}${cpugraph cpu4 000000 ffffff}
I believe there is a way of doing it in BB as well..
- pitkon and diabol like this
#8
Posted 25 January 2015 - 05:24 PM
should not be that hard to add
That sounds promising
#9
Posted 26 January 2015 - 10:02 PM
i'd go with rainmeter or autohotkey for now
#10
Posted 09 February 2015 - 10:28 AM
this is for testing.. bbi with per core load
Attached Files
- pitkon and Paz like this
#11
Posted 09 February 2015 - 10:50 AM
Again, Avast wouldn't let me save this... Had to disable Avast to download...
#12
Posted 09 February 2015 - 11:18 AM
try to update avast, Pete.. maybe they fixed it
#13
Posted 09 February 2015 - 11:26 AM
try to update avast, Pete.. maybe they fixed it
I use the latest build. Had to disable Avast to save... I also had to disable Avast to install the exe, it still gives warning about Evo Win32 virus. In fact, it deleted the exe as soon as I re-enabled Avast. Is anyone else facing the same issues with other antivirus apps?
#15
Posted 09 February 2015 - 11:34 AM
I see Avast gives a clean bill of health to BBZero on virustotal, but yet it refuses to give it a pass on my computer. Funny thing is, as soon as I installed BBZero (disabling Avast) I enabled Avast and let it check BBZero, the folder. It didn't find anything suspicious. It's enough to drive you nuts...
#16
Posted 09 February 2015 - 11:51 AM
OK, what is the syntax you use to display different cores?
#17
Posted 09 February 2015 - 12:10 PM
CoreLoad0.. CoreLoadN
#18
Posted 09 February 2015 - 01:45 PM
CoreLoad0.. CoreLoadN
Gonna need some documentation, looks like...
#19
Posted 09 February 2015 - 02:10 PM
or was it CoreUsage0.. CoreUsageN ? sorry
- diabol likes this
#20
Posted 15 February 2015 - 09:00 AM
- Paz likes this
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users